Partner with us to produce thought leadership that moves the needle on behavioral healthcare.
Other options to get involvedWe received your information and will be in contact soon!
We fund organizations and projects which disrupt our current behavioral health space and create impact at the individual, organizational, and societal levels.
Our participatory funds alter traditional grantmaking by shifting power
to impacted communities to direct resources and make funding decisions.
We build public and private partnerships to administer grant dollars toward targeted programs.
We provide funds at below-market interest rates that can be particularly useful to start, grow, or sustain a program, or when results cannot be achieved with grant dollars alone.
Add some text here
Contact Alyson about grantmaking, program related investments, and the paper series.
Contact Samantha about program planning and evaluation consulting services.
Contact Caitlin about the Community Fund for Immigrant Wellness, the Annual Innovation Award, and trauma-informed programming.
Contact Joe about partnership opportunities, thought leadership, and the Foundation’s property.
Add some text here
As a behavioral health foundation, we are gravely concerned about the mental health impacts of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. The overturning of the 50-year precedent set by Roe v. Wade, stripping women and birthing people of their constitutional right to bodily autonomy, is harmful. This will undoubtedly jeopardize the mental wellness of individuals, lead to increased rates of maternal mortality and morbidity, and disproportionately impact Black, Indigenous, and people of color, people with disabilities, undocumented people, and people who are low-income.
The landmark Turnaway Study documents the many impacts of being denied a wanted abortion. In the short term, individuals who are denied abortion care report higher levels of anxiety, lower life satisfaction, and lower self esteem than those who receive an abortion. Birthing people who were denied access to abortion care also faced more significant physical health risks, were four times as likely to live below the Federal Poverty Line, and were at greater risk of experiencing intimate partner violence. Their children are more likely to grow up in poverty and experience poor bonding with their mothers.
While the decision does not outlaw abortions nationwide (abortion is still legal in the state of Pennsylvania; see the current status of abortion rights in your state), birthing people in states that restrict abortion will face significant barriers to accessing care. Even if those individuals are able to obtain an abortion out of state, research shows that facing barriers to abortion care is associated with higher levels of emotional distress. Those who will face the most barriers are those with the fewest resources.
The research is clear. This decision will cause significant mental health harm. At the Scattergood Foundation, we believe that we must recognize the basic dignity in every human. The Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson stands in direct contrast to that core value.
For resources and to learn more: